• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Film

The 1966 Game: Who’s Jane Fonda Now?

by Dana Blankenhorn
August 9, 2006
in Film, history, politics, The 1966 Game
2
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Cat_ballou
This one is a real poser, because Jane Fonda — as in f%&@@ Jane Fonda — did not exist in 1966.

This was the Jane Fonda that existed in 1966.

Fonda was, in 1966, one of the hardest working, hottest, most popular young actresses in Hollywood. She was, after all, Hollywood royalty — daughter of Henry, sister of Peter. She was coming off one of her biggest box office successes, as Cat Ballou in 1965 (from which this is taken). And the next year she would have another great success with Robert Redford in Barefoot in the Park.

The year 1966 saw the release of three of her films, however, all of them forgettable. (Great roles are rare.) These were The Chase, The Game is Over, and Ash Wednesday.

I’m certain, however, that you were thinking of THAT Jane Fonda, the 1972 Jane Fonda. From 1966 her trajectory was turning ever-more leftward. Her father had been a shining liberal hero, a man whose image was defined by the FDR Political Thesis, and she was headed toward the logical (in retrospect) extreme end of that arc, her own date with extremism. From Barbarella to They Shoot Horses, Don’t They to Klute, she was playing increasingly hard-edged roles which represented everything the Nixon Revolution meant to crush.

And, with her 1972 trip to Hanoi, she gave them all the ammunition they would ever need. Even in 2006, an attempt to honor her in her adopted home state of Georgia failed because of Republican opposition to that f%$&@&@ Jane Fonda.

So who’s Jane Fonda now?

Melgibson4_1
OK, we’ll use the  f%&%$&@ Jane Fonda.

Career self-destruction is a grand Hollywood tradition. Whether over morals like Fatty Arbuckle, or politics, careers can be quickly extinguished over things that, in retrospect, appear trivial. (As opposed to a lack of talent, or the Hollywood Peter Principle, which is another thing entirely, Dennis Miller.)

It’s possible Mel Gibson’s career will survive its present nadir. But he has already made himself anathema to nearly half the audience, and I think that’s the test.

It’s a shame, too, because Gibson, like Fonda, has enormous talent. He can do a wide range of roles. He can direct a wide range of films.

But from now on, I’m afraid he’ll be known to many of us as an anti-semite, just as Fonda is still seen by many as a Communist. If you want me to get off his back, tell Newsmax and the rest to get off hers. The woman’s a grandmother, for gosh sakes. It was over 30 years ago and she has apologized countless times.

But you won’t. So I’m under no obligation, either.

Tags: gameshistorical analogyhistory gameHollywoodHollywood scandalJane FondaMel GibsonThe 1966 Game
Previous Post

The Economic Laws of Content

Next Post

Hawley! Smoot!

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

Hawley! Smoot!

Comments 2

  1. Anonymous says:
    18 years ago

    Were you in Vietnam?Anyone who supports the traitor fonda (not deserving of a capital) is as bad and as ignorant as that piece of trash is.As for Gibson,good for him as he only spoke mostly the truth.I think he will survive quite well with out the support of the likes of you.If fonda had pulled the antics she did as a Vietnam citizen she would have been shot in quick order.Grandmother and still trash,it’s a shame she didn’t learn anything from her father.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    18 years ago

    Were you in Vietnam?Anyone who supports the traitor fonda (not deserving of a capital) is as bad and as ignorant as that piece of trash is.As for Gibson,good for him as he only spoke mostly the truth.I think he will survive quite well with out the support of the likes of you.If fonda had pulled the antics she did as a Vietnam citizen she would have been shot in quick order.Grandmother and still trash,it’s a shame she didn’t learn anything from her father.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved